Friday File - 17 August, 2007

August 17th, 2007 | by David

Another week down. A pretty good mix in the file today, which makes up for last week’s admittedly weaker performance.

Cynthia Rettig over at MIT Sloan gives us a great article on enterprise software, and why, frankly it sucks so badly. I’ll be passing this one along given recent frustrations. Unfortunately, Ms. Rettig offers little in the way of solutions.

Alan Becker faces the horrors of flash animation gone bad, in a highly amusing piece of work. I’m not usually into this stuff, but this one’s worth the time. Brilliant.

Here’s a great bit from Seth Godin on “being the opposite“. Short. Sweet. Insightful.

Finally, Steve Pavlina again, with perhaps the best article I’ve ever read on self improvement. If you’re feeling down, a little beat up or just unhappy with life, you really need to read it.

I’m out for this week. Next week: A new business idea, all about goals and a brand new feature for the currently vacant Thursday spot.

Until then!

The Lifecycle of a Team

July 23rd, 2007 | by David

Teams are interesting creatures. I say ‘creatures’ because once a team is formed, it becomes its own entity, living and breathing as a distinct animal. And like any animal, teams must be nurtured from birth, they will mature and then they’ll die.

As leaders it’s important to note that as unique as we feel our teams are, their existence is always built from a predictable pattern of general behaviour. Each team is created, lives and dies in the same pattern; the same cycle.

This cycle is controllable however - good leaders will be able to mold it to maximize output and accomplish the goals that the team exists to achieve. (Importantly, “team survival” should never be one of those!) Poor leaders fall victim to it, and end up struggling to react.

The Cycle, Explained

The Team Lifecycle is a simple yet often overlooked reality. All teams, in every endeavor follow this exact same pattern:

The Life Cycle of a Team

Building - Bringing a team together, where members are still feeling each other out, and trying to merge their own personal style and habits with those of others. At this point, the team is very much a collection of individuals, and will remain so - effectively - until a leader guides them. The larger the team, the longer the building stage takes to complete.

Performance - Once built, the team achieves peak performance and produces high quality output. The team comes into its own, acting in unison. Team members start to anticipate each other’s actions and take pride in the fact that they are simply a part of something bigger than themselves. Leaders start to find that they can become more strategic than tactical, and focus more on the “bigger picture”.

Conversion - Conversion can occur instantly or over several weeks; from within or as a result of an external process. In certain, task oriented teams, it is an anticipated event. More often though, conversion catches leaders off guard. It’s this state that is the most taxing on leaders and teams alike, and the only certainty is that it occurs. The team will adapt, though sometimes through complete destruction. Conversion requires constant management and tough choices.

Nurture and Release - Molding Yourself to Your Team’s Cyclic Point

Ideally, a leader wants to live as long as possible in the performance stage. Each stage in the cycle is self sustaining, meaning that the longer you allow a team to spend in it, the harder it will be to break into the next stage.

It’s important to embrace each cyclic point however. Building a team takes time, and if it isn’t done correctly there can be lingering animosity that will undermine the team and cause unintended - and undesired - conversion events. At the building stage, the team as an entity is weak and relies on its leader for direction, purpose and support. At the same time, it needs to grow from within, each member establishing a natural hierarchy that will serve it in the next phase. Too much leading, and the team will be lost without you, too little, and the connections within the team will not form correctly.

Just as important is the leader’s ability to recognize and switch styles as the team begins to gel. You’ve been encouraging and developing your team - let them perform! With a team at peak performance, the leader’s job is to keep them there by properly distributing work, making decisions and generally staying out of the way.

Keeping out of the day-to-day events is the only way you’ll be able to start thinking strategically about situations. It’s up to the leader to anticipate the inevitable conversion stage.

Forecasting and Directing Conversion

Although all teams must go through a conversion event at some point, if it’s handled well it doesn’t need to be completely destructive. By definition, conversion will mean change, and the team will not be the same as it was prior. Remember, it’s a cycle. After every conversion, there will be a rebuilding process. If as a leader, you’re capable of recognizing - even anticipating - conversion events, you’ll be able to direct the outcomes and strengthen the team.

Take a look at the following sketches:

Creating Positive Conversion

Allowing Destructive Conversion

These graphs are overly simplistic, but they illustrate the principle properly. By recognizing and anticipating conversion events, the leader can cascade a successive series of changes into a positive direction for the team and it’s members. On the contrary, a leader that does not make himself aware of the natural cycle can at best find himself reacting to cascading negative events, and at worst, making decisions that serve to amplify them.

You can’t deny change, it’s going to happen and it’s going to cause your team to move into the conversion point of the cycle. How you handle it is what will make the difference.

Common Traps and Pitfalls

Many active leaders fail to grasp the natural cycle of the team. Others recognize stage transitions and attempt to stop them. Others still have problems conferring the right style for the applicable stage. Specifically, here are some of the main traps and pitfalls that can befall an ignorant leader:

  • Seeing a natural stage adjustment as avoidable/undesirable
  • Denying the state that the team is in
  • Under managing during the building stage
  • Keeping the team in the building stage too long
  • Over managing during the performance stage
  • Attempting to stop a conversion event (e.g. not allowing an earned promotion)
  • Amplifying destructive conversion by failing to anticipate
  • Not recovering using constructive conversion techniques
  • Seeing conversion events as end points

The Leader is Key

As always, your ability as a leader will determine your ability to navigate the team life cycle. As a new leader, you should focus on building a team for high performance. As your team develops confidence, extend responsibility and allow team members to begin solving their own problems, while you keep your eye out for conversion events. You’ll probably find yourself reacting to the first one.

Understanding the cycle will put you ahead of most and get you back into the rebuilding mode. Go with the flow, accept the inevitability of the cycle and your choices will become much clearer.

NeuroLeadership? Not. Leadership is About What Happens Outside the Brain, Not in it.

July 20th, 2007 | by David

The Brain of a Leader?Recently, BusinessWeek ran an article about neuroleadership, a new area of study being explored by leadership consultant David Rock. In a nutshell, Neuroleadership is the idea that scientists can measure patterns of thought using EEGs and MRIs and determine those that suggest positive leadership traits.

Rock has already helped organize an neuroleadership summit in Italy that incorporates this “science of leadership” into it’s program. The cost? $3500.

Soft skills, especially those related to human behaviour, are difficult to understand and even harder to master. As such, they are often subject to their own form of alchemy. There’s a big market for turning lead into gold, after all. These days, these shamen take a promising premise, exaggerate the effects, hype the resulting gain in insight, and sell it all for big bucks. This is done brilliantly in the personal development arena by the people behind “The Secret”. I fear the the folk at BusinessWeek have fallen prey to Mr. Rock’s attempt at doing the same to leadership by introducing science as a cure for the ambiguity present in the art of leadership.

Michael McKinney over on the Leading Blog highlights the problem with applying science to an art form:

“The problem with rushing to apply a science to any field is that passion often overrides experience; we tend to throw out conventional wisdom and common sense in favor of the new. In the excitement, we begin to look for absolutes where there are none and never will be.”

Exactly. Rob May at Businesspundit elaborates:

“If you look at popular leadership blogs, very few of them treat leadership as a simple here-is-what-you-do kind of thing. It’s complex, and I don’t believe there is one style or one answer. Leadership varies as much as leaders, teams, and situations vary.”

There are no “Quick Fixes”

Leadership can’t be broken down into a science of yes and no actions to situations any more than having a fulfilling life can be broken down into simply thinking happy thoughts - ala The Secret. Dealing with people requires a degree of ambiguity, personality and human touch.

Take heed to those that will sell you methods that look at poor leadership as simply a lack of the right formula.

Close
E-mail It